About these images


Login

Log in is required on this site ONLY to join an ASA member community group and contribute to the community blogs.

Are you a current ASA member?
Forgot your password?

Register

Register here for the annual meeting and to begin or renew an ASA membership

Register here to submit a proposal through the ASA's 2012 submission site.

Register here for JHU Press and ASA membership services, including online access to American Quarterly and the Encyclopedia of American Studies Online.

Register here to join an ASA community. Only current ASA members may contribute to the community blogs. Registration is not required to submit display or text ads or news and events or to view many pages. We will refuse posts that are not of professional interest to ASA members.

Click here for membership FAQ's

Events

Jun. 30 | 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies due

Jun. 30 | 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies Teaching, Advising, and Program Development due

Oct. 1 | Travel Grants for Graduate Students
For submission guidelines, click here

Resources: Abstracts of American Studies Dissertations

By University | By Year

Weisblat, Tinky. "Will the Real George and Gracie and Ozzie and Harriet and Desi and Lucy Please Stand Up? - The Functions of Popular Biography in 1950s Television," University of Texas at Austin, January 1991. Advisor: Tom Schatz (2, 14, 11)

Using a cultural-studies approach, this dissertation examines the discourse about the “real” George Burns and Gracie Allen, Ozzie and harriet Nelson, and Desi Arnaz and Lucille Ball in the 1950s press. Like the television programs in which these couples starred, the offscreen biographies were fictions performing cultural work. The study delineates that work, posting that the biographies performed two functions. First, they embodied struggles between the couples and individual, social, and institutional structures. They also acted to shape viewing contexts for the programs, containing their potential threats to gender norms by juxtaposing them against a more normative reality.