About these images


Login

Log in is required on this site ONLY to join an ASA member community group and contribute to the community blogs.

Are you a current ASA member?
Forgot your password?

Register

Register here for the annual meeting and to begin or renew an ASA membership

Register here to submit a proposal through the ASA's 2012 submission site.

Register here for JHU Press and ASA membership services, including online access to American Quarterly and the Encyclopedia of American Studies Online.

Register here to join an ASA community. Only current ASA members may contribute to the community blogs. Registration is not required to submit display or text ads or news and events or to view many pages. We will refuse posts that are not of professional interest to ASA members.

Click here for membership FAQ's

Events

Jun. 30 | 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies due

Jun. 30 | 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies Teaching, Advising, and Program Development due

Oct. 1 | Travel Grants for Graduate Students
For submission guidelines, click here

Resources: Abstracts of American Studies Dissertations

By University | By Year

Phillips, Mary Lou Luttrell. "The Language of Naval Performance Evaluation: Officer Promotion as Reader Response and the Ideal Officer Concept," University of Maryland, College Park, Spring 1989. Advisor: Myron Lounsbury (12, 2, 5)

This research explores the language of performance evaluation in the United States Navy in an effort to learn to what degree we may say that readers of a specific cultural sub-group read a written text in a uniform manner. The readers in this study are Promotion-Board-eligible Navy Officers, the focal in-group, and foreign volunteers, a comparative out-group, who have volunteered to read and review the evaluations according to specifically designed instructions. A survey of the specific words indicating both strong and weak promote signals was devised and administered to all the research participants and the results are compared.