About these images


Login

Log in is required on this site ONLY to join an ASA member community group and contribute to the community blogs.

Are you a current ASA member?
Forgot your password?

Register

Register here for the annual meeting and to begin or renew an ASA membership

Register here to submit a proposal through the ASA's 2012 submission site.

Register here for JHU Press and ASA membership services, including online access to American Quarterly and the Encyclopedia of American Studies Online.

Register here to join an ASA community. Only current ASA members may contribute to the community blogs. Registration is not required to submit display or text ads or news and events or to view many pages. We will refuse posts that are not of professional interest to ASA members.

Click here for membership FAQ's

Events

Jun. 30 | 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies due

Jun. 30 | 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies Teaching, Advising, and Program Development due

Oct. 1 | Travel Grants for Graduate Students
For submission guidelines, click here

Resources: Abstracts of American Studies Dissertations

By University | By Year

Linkon, Sherry Lee. "Rose Terry Cooke and The Woman Question: A Study in Fiction and Ideology," University of Minnesota, May 1990.

Using the fiction and essays of Rose Terry Cooke (182701892), this case study examines women’s opposition to the women’s rights movement during the second half of the nineteenth century. Cooke’s writings illustrate the central contradiction of “Anti” ideology. They blamed male values, especially individualism and commercialism, for social problems and believed that women could repair these problems through domesticity, piety-in-action, motherly caring, and selflessness. Yet Cooke’s stories also show how good womanhood could harm women and that women’s influence often failed because of their own weaknesses. This contradiction helps explain the ultimate failure of the “Antis’” ideas.