About these images


Login

Log in is required on this site ONLY to join an ASA member community group and contribute to the community blogs.

Are you a current ASA member?
Forgot your password?

Register

Register here for the annual meeting and to begin or renew an ASA membership

Register here to submit a proposal through the ASA's 2012 submission site.

Register here for JHU Press and ASA membership services, including online access to American Quarterly and the Encyclopedia of American Studies Online.

Register here to join an ASA community. Only current ASA members may contribute to the community blogs. Registration is not required to submit display or text ads or news and events or to view many pages. We will refuse posts that are not of professional interest to ASA members.

Click here for membership FAQ's

Events

Jun. 30 | 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies due

Jun. 30 | 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies Teaching, Advising, and Program Development due

Oct. 1 | Travel Grants for Graduate Students
For submission guidelines, click here

Resources: Abstracts of American Studies Dissertations

By University | By Year

Schur, Richard Lee. "Rites or Rhetoric: Toni Morrison, Louis Valdez, and Critical Race Theory," American Studies, University of Kansas, May 2000.

This dissertation argues that literary writers and cultural critics, such as Luis Valdez and Toni Morrison, share an intellectual space with legal scholars of color, such as Patricia Williams and Richard Delgado. Applying theoretical concepts from postcolonial theory such as hybridity, catachresis, and the subaltern, this dissertation concludes that these seemingly disparate writers have developed a complex, theoretical critique of social, cultural, and legal relations articulated through poststructural writing practices in response to the successes and failures of the Civil Rights Movement. This analysis illustrates how these writers displace traditional approaches to social reform through law by insisting on the relationships between law and culture, and culture and social “fictions.” By exploring the slippage between rites and rights, this inquiry interrogates the complicity between cultural-literary practices and legal discourse in the post-Civil Rights era in the U.S.