About these images


Login

Log in is required on this site ONLY to join an ASA member community group and contribute to the community blogs.

Are you a current ASA member?
Forgot your password?

Register

Register here for the annual meeting and to begin or renew an ASA membership

Register here to submit a proposal through the ASA's 2012 submission site.

Register here for JHU Press and ASA membership services, including online access to American Quarterly and the Encyclopedia of American Studies Online.

Register here to join an ASA community. Only current ASA members may contribute to the community blogs. Registration is not required to submit display or text ads or news and events or to view many pages. We will refuse posts that are not of professional interest to ASA members.

Click here for membership FAQ's

Events

Jun. 30 | 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies due

Jun. 30 | 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies Teaching, Advising, and Program Development due

Oct. 1 | Travel Grants for Graduate Students
For submission guidelines, click here

Resources: Abstracts of American Studies Dissertations

By University | By Year

Leonard, Angela Michele. "Reading Political Poetry: A Discourse Analysis of the Antislavery Poems of John Greenleaf Whittier and the Corn Law Rhymes of Ebenezer Elliott," Department of American Studies, George Washington University, January 1994.

Conventional literary criticism dismisses the political poetry of Ebenezer Elliott (1781-1849) and of John Greenleaf Whittier (1807-1892) because of its explicitly agitational and functional character and not particularly aesthetic political opinions. But Elliott and Whittier deserve serious attention because their poetry countered “strategies of containment,” such as Britain’s Corn Laws and America’s institution of chattel slavery, respectively. The adopted methodology, “discourse analysis,” expands our understanding of these poets, intertextually links their verses to particular political reform movements and corresponding literary discourses of protest, and enlarges the canon of serious political poetry.