About these images


Login

Log in is required on this site ONLY to join an ASA member community group and contribute to the community blogs.

Are you a current ASA member?
Forgot your password?

Register

Register here for the annual meeting and to begin or renew an ASA membership

Register here to submit a proposal through the ASA's 2012 submission site.

Register here for JHU Press and ASA membership services, including online access to American Quarterly and the Encyclopedia of American Studies Online.

Register here to join an ASA community. Only current ASA members may contribute to the community blogs. Registration is not required to submit display or text ads or news and events or to view many pages. We will refuse posts that are not of professional interest to ASA members.

Click here for membership FAQ's

Events

Jun. 30 | 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies due

Jun. 30 | 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies Teaching, Advising, and Program Development due

Oct. 1 | Travel Grants for Graduate Students
For submission guidelines, click here

Resources: Abstracts of American Studies Dissertations

By University | By Year

Rice, Stephen P. "Minding the Machine: Languages of Class in Early Industrial America, 1820-1860," American Studies Program, Yale University, September 1996.

Americans experiencing early mechanization formulated distinct working-class and middle-class identities in diverse social and cultural practices. But most American did not equate class separation with class antagonism. This study understands this equanimity by considering how classes formed discursively as they formed socially. Drawing on a range of printed materials, it finds that ideas about class circulated through a national discourse on mechanization. In this popular discourse, middle-class Americans defused the potential for class conflict by representing vexed class relations as analogous to less-contested relations between human and machine, head and hand, and mind and body. Chapters examining steam boiler explosions, the mechanics’ institute movement, and popular physiology reform show how these languages of class appeared neutral on divisive questions about mechanization.