About these images


Login

Log in is required on this site ONLY to join an ASA member community group and contribute to the community blogs.

Are you a current ASA member?
Forgot your password?

Register

Register here for the annual meeting and to begin or renew an ASA membership

Register here to submit a proposal through the ASA's 2012 submission site.

Register here for JHU Press and ASA membership services, including online access to American Quarterly and the Encyclopedia of American Studies Online.

Register here to join an ASA community. Only current ASA members may contribute to the community blogs. Registration is not required to submit display or text ads or news and events or to view many pages. We will refuse posts that are not of professional interest to ASA members.

Click here for membership FAQ's

Events

Jun. 30 | 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies due

Jun. 30 | 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies Teaching, Advising, and Program Development due

Oct. 1 | Travel Grants for Graduate Students
For submission guidelines, click here

Resources: Abstracts of American Studies Dissertations

By University | By Year

Cameron, Jean. "John Cotton's Role in the Trials of Anne Hutchinson," University of Minnesota, October 1991. Advisor: Roland Delattre (16,11,22)

In 1637-8 in Boston, Massachusetts, Anne Hutchinson was convicted at trials for sedition and heresy. Scholars have assumed she was guilty—by Puritan standards. John Cotton, her pastor, believed to hold Hutchinson’s possibly heretical theology, disavowed it under pressure. At Hutchinson’s civil trial, he did not protest when she was convicted. At the church trial, Cotton questioned her aggressively, and insisted upon excommunication. This study investigates the trials, and her guilt, focusing on the religious questions involved. It finds that Hutchinson was not guilty, by Puritan criteria, and that it was Cotton’s actions that guaranteed her conviction.