About these images


Login

Log in is required on this site ONLY to join an ASA member community group and contribute to the community blogs.

Are you a current ASA member?
Forgot your password?

Register

Register here for the annual meeting and to begin or renew an ASA membership

Register here to submit a proposal through the ASA's 2012 submission site.

Register here for JHU Press and ASA membership services, including online access to American Quarterly and the Encyclopedia of American Studies Online.

Register here to join an ASA community. Only current ASA members may contribute to the community blogs. Registration is not required to submit display or text ads or news and events or to view many pages. We will refuse posts that are not of professional interest to ASA members.

Click here for membership FAQ's

Events

Jun. 30 | 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies due

Jun. 30 | 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies Teaching, Advising, and Program Development due

Oct. 1 | Travel Grants for Graduate Students
For submission guidelines, click here

Resources: Abstracts of American Studies Dissertations

By University | By Year

Rael-Gálvez, Estévan. "Identifying Captivity and Capturing Identity: Narratives of American Indian Slavery, Colorado and New Mexico, 1776-1934," University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, May 2002. Advisor: Ann Arbor

Between 1700 and 1880, a period extending through three distinctive governments, almost 5000 indigenous women and children were entered into and held in New Mexico and Colorado households as slaves. The greatest number of those captured were baptized and held in the northernmost regions of New Mexico and southern Colorado, primarily in the Taos and San Luis valleys Intricately connected and attendant to the development of this particular system of slavery were the cyclical forces of war expansion, settlement and trade. Mestizaje, generations of racial and cultural mixture, defined as much by amicable unions as by coercive relations, also emerged as a direct consequence of these enslavements. American Indian slavery, from its inception, through the language of war and retribution and civilization and conversion effectively obscured the practice, as did the constructions of custom and family. This study examines this contradiction, the counter-narratives embedded in the master narratives through a variety of documents, where both experienced reality as well as the images of the Indian other emerge in stark contrasts and subtle nuances. While this slave trade reached its zenith following U.S. American conquest, it was also this convergence, with the nation just then emerging from division over the issue, that forced the debate over the system’s definitions, meanings and consequences. Those debates and their subsequent documents ultimately resulted in its reconstruction. Beyond the master narratives, the focus in this study is upon individual salve narratives, taking as a basic premise the critical nature of small stories within the grander narratives of colonialism. Hence, this study is essentially about being Indian in the wrong place, which accentuates the discourse about and around family, homelands, empires, and the very contest over the images of slavery and indianess alike. However, this recovery of American Indian histories is also a study of memories and legacies, revealing through histories experienced, represented, imagined and passed down through storytelling, the complexity of identities that are the inheritance of New Mexican Hispanos.