About these images


Login

Log in is required on this site ONLY to join an ASA member community group and contribute to the community blogs.

Are you a current ASA member?
Forgot your password?

Register

Register here for the annual meeting and to begin or renew an ASA membership

Register here to submit a proposal through the ASA's 2012 submission site.

Register here for JHU Press and ASA membership services, including online access to American Quarterly and the Encyclopedia of American Studies Online.

Register here to join an ASA community. Only current ASA members may contribute to the community blogs. Registration is not required to submit display or text ads or news and events or to view many pages. We will refuse posts that are not of professional interest to ASA members.

Click here for membership FAQ's

Events

Jun. 30 | 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies due

Jun. 30 | 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies Teaching, Advising, and Program Development due

Oct. 1 | Travel Grants for Graduate Students
For submission guidelines, click here

Resources: Abstracts of American Studies Dissertations

By University | By Year

Dawtry, John J. "Elite Responses to Poverty and the Poor in Cincinnati, 1840-1900," Department of History, University of Wales, May 1997.

This study of Victorian-era social policy aims to catalog the history of that policy and to trace its determinants. In addition to reexamining some existing hypotheses—such as poor relief having been utilized by elites to “regulate” the poor—this study suggests some conclusions of its own. First, rapid urban and industrial growth—together with some severe economic reverses and the ramifications of the Civil War—had profound implications for the city’s many slum-dwelling poor: through under-employment, migrations, industrial injury, and death. Second, Cincinnati’s antebellum elite promulgated a paternalistic benevolence. Third, such notions were replaced as the development of social policy was overshadowed by captains of manufacturing industry. Fourth, the preferred mode of elite eleemosynary response—voluntarist benevolence—proved too small in scale to provide an adequate solution to the challenge posed by nineteenth-century urban poverty.