About these images


Login

Log in is required on this site ONLY to join an ASA member community group and contribute to the community blogs.

Are you a current ASA member?
Forgot your password?

Register

Register here for the annual meeting and to begin or renew an ASA membership

Register here to submit a proposal through the ASA's 2012 submission site.

Register here for JHU Press and ASA membership services, including online access to American Quarterly and the Encyclopedia of American Studies Online.

Register here to join an ASA community. Only current ASA members may contribute to the community blogs. Registration is not required to submit display or text ads or news and events or to view many pages. We will refuse posts that are not of professional interest to ASA members.

Click here for membership FAQ's

Events

Jun. 30 | 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies due

Jun. 30 | 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies Teaching, Advising, and Program Development due

Oct. 1 | Travel Grants for Graduate Students
For submission guidelines, click here

Resources: Abstracts of American Studies Dissertations

By University | By Year

Coffey, Marion J. "Conceiving a Social Movement: Pro Choice Organizing Post-Roe v Wade," American Civilization, Brown University, May 2001.

The 1973 Supreme Court decision in the case of Roe v. Wade marked the beginning of a virulent war in America surrounding abortion rights. In the decades following Roe, pro-choice and pro-life groups engaged in a continuous struggle, forming organized and lasting social movements These movements operated on the national, state and local levels in a variety of ways. The pro-choice movement was especially diverse in its organizing strategies because of a series of legal defeats following Roe. These defeats compelled the pro-choice movement to mobilize on several fronts. Pro-choice movement activists engaged in litigation, built national, state, and local advocacy institutions, formed grass roots clinic escort collectives, and organized medical students, who, as future physicians, could someday provide abortion services. This dissertation analyzes these four organizing tactics adopted by the pro-choice movement. Four case studies are presented using a combination of written documents and oral histories of participants within both the pro-choice and pro-life movements. Of central concern is how the pro-choice movement configured itself following a major 1973 judicial victory and in defensive response to a powerful and organized counter attack by pro-lifers.