Register
If you haven’t already, register to start contributing news and events, and to search the Member Directory. Registration is free, but only open to current members of the American Studies Association.
Events
Jan. 9 | Call for papers: Identities and Technocultures
A 2-day conference about American culture and technologies that examines how new technologies dominate and define Americaness in the US and abroad. Co-sponsored by the University of Iowa Center for Ethnic Studies and the Arts (CESA) and the Mid-America American Studies Association (MAASA).
Resources: Abstracts of American Studies Dissertations
By University | By Year
Harris, Lisa. "Challenging Conception: A Clinical and Cultural History of In Vitro Fertilization in the United States," American Culture, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, May 2006.
In vitro fertilization (IVF) came into existence in the United State not only because of the particular technical innovations achieved by reproductive scientists, but because of the ways in which reproduction intersected with American social ideologies and political structures. Specifically, IVF was built upon a trio of cultural phenomena that emerged after World War II: delayed childbearing, as women entered the professional workforce in increasing numbers in the 1970s and 1980s; specific forms of capitalism and consumer culture, including the fee-for-service health care system; and the complex social and political impasse on abortion that arose in response to Roe v. Wade. Drawing on oral histories with American IVF innovators, the archival documents of the first U.S. IVF clinic, medical literature, national IVF outcomes databases, government reports, and popular media representations of infertility and IVF, it demonstrates that in vitro fertilization, as clinical procedure and as a social discourse, moved through five phases in its twenty-five year U.S. history. The period prior to the birth of the first U.S. IVF baby in 1981 was characterized by technical challenges and strident objections from religious forces nationwide. Between 1982 and 1984, IVF became a national phenomenon, and the moral and ethical questions of the earlier period were superseded by legal ones. From 1985 to 1991, the patient profile for IVF dominated developments, as both the media and clinicians sorted out which individuals would receive in vitro treatment. Between 1992 and 1997, scandal and critique from within and without tested IVF’s resilience. Most recently, from 1997 to 2002, the role of IVF as a controversial object of inquiry diminished as the technology was integrated into medical practice in a manner that truly transformed American culture. IVF altered the relationship between reproduction and the market, re-invigorated controversy over abortion, and eclipsed public discussion of non-technological solutions to the difficulties generated by American women’s growing commitments to balancing work and family.
Quick Links
American Quarterly [official journal site]
American Quarterly [editorial site]