About these images


Login

Log in is required on this site ONLY to join an ASA member community group and contribute to the community blogs.

Are you a current ASA member?
Forgot your password?

Register

Register here for the annual meeting and to begin or renew an ASA membership

Register here to submit a proposal through the ASA's 2012 submission site.

Register here for JHU Press and ASA membership services, including online access to American Quarterly and the Encyclopedia of American Studies Online.

Register here to join an ASA community. Only current ASA members may contribute to the community blogs. Registration is not required to submit display or text ads or news and events or to view many pages. We will refuse posts that are not of professional interest to ASA members.

Click here for membership FAQ's

Events

Jun. 30 | 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Bode-Pearson Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies due

Jun. 30 | 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize
Nominations for the 2012 Mary C. Turpie Prize for Outstanding Contributions to American Studies Teaching, Advising, and Program Development due

Oct. 1 | Travel Grants for Graduate Students
For submission guidelines, click here

Resources: Abstracts of American Studies Dissertations

By University | By Year

Newcomb, John Timberman. "Canonization of Wallace Stevens: A Study of Modernist Evaluative Practice," Duke University, May 1987.

The intricate processes by which Wallace Stevens’ reputation ascended were contingent upon the emergence of modernism as a dominant cultural formation. This study traces that rise both through the history of reader response to Stevens and through the broader cultural forces at work in the formation of modernist canons, particularly the assimilation and institutionalization of early modernist avantgardism which culminated in the rise of New Criticism. First perceived as an obscure “aesthetic” poet, Stevens was at a disadvantage against the early hegemonic forces of modernist canonicity, which valorized accessible vernacular poetry. By 1940, however, a large influential group of younger poet-critics saw him as one of their masters; his canonical potential was by then clearly apparent.