About these images


Log in is required on this site ONLY to join an ASA member community group and contribute to the community blogs.

Create an account

Reset your password


Register here for the annual meeting and to begin or renew an ASA membership

Register here to submit a proposal through the ASA's 2014 submission site. (Closed)

Access your ASA membership account at JHU Press including online access to American Quarterly and the Encyclopedia of American Studies Online. Forgot your membership account password

Create an account to join an ASA community. Only current ASA members may contribute to the community blogs. Registration is not required to submit display or text ads or news and events or to view many pages. We will refuse posts that are not of professional interest to ASA members.

Click here for membership FAQ's

Member Tools

We're sorry. You are not yet a member of the Digital Humanities Caucus.

Register or login to join this group.

Main | Resources | 2012 Roundtable | Contact | Contact Members

Digital Humanities Caucus

And Vice Versa

This entry is part of the American Studies and Digital Humanities 2012 Roundtable.

The term digital humanities includes a lot of things—visualization and mapping, text analysis and topic modeling, corpus building and preservation, the gathering of data, and the production of metadata, and the computational exploration of all of the above. Though all of these approaches are digital, they bear the same kinds of methodological differences that play out through our traditional fields; further, these approaches are often put to use in the service of strikingly different intellectual questions. To say that the “digital humanities” is a field is not terribly different, to my way of thinking, from saying that the humanities is a field: yes, we are all interested in reading culture; everything beyond that—what we mean when we say “reading”; what we mean by “culture”—varies enormously.

So thinking about what something as broadly conceived as the “digital humanities” can bring to American Studies requires thinking about that one unifier—the digital—and what it adds to the enterprise. And where I intend to focus my attention during this session (probably unsurprisingly, given the work that I’ve been doing for the last several years) is on how the spread of digitization and the increasingly networked nature of the humanities are affecting the ways that scholars communicate with one another. Perhaps more importantly, though, I believe that American Studies has some crucial contributions to make to those new forms of digital scholarly communication, and I hope that our conversation during this session can help lay the groundwork for fruitful collaborations to come.

By Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Sun, November 11, 2012 - 4:40 pm
Categories: Ideas

Add Your Comment


(not published)

(not published)


Submit the word you see below:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?