About these images

Annual Meeting

Submit a Proposal (Closed)

Pedagogies of Dissent

November 9-12, 2017: Chicago, Illinois

The 2017 ASA Program Committee invites current individual members of the ASA (or an affiliated international American studies association) to submit proposals for individual papers, entire sessions, presentations, performances, films, round-tables, workshops, conversations, or alternative formats described below on any topic dealing with American cultures.

The submission site will open on January 1, 2017. Proposals are due on or before February 1, 2017.

The theme for the 2017 Annual Meeting of the American Studies Association, "Pedagogies of Dissent," emphasizes the conjuncture of education, politics, and intellectual work that has long been and remains central to the vibrancy of American studies. From Paulo Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed to Jacqueline Alexander's Pedagogies of Crossing, and including a broad and diverse range of iterations signaled by such associated terms as teaching and training, learning and unlearning, transgression and transformation, and consciousness raising, this line of thought enjoins critical recognition of the embeddedness of education broadly and the university in specific, within the social field.

In bringing together "pedagogy" and "dissent," the Program Committee invites inquiry into the intellectual, political, historical and social genealogies of critical and transformative thought and praxis, not only in the literal space of the classroom, but also more broadly, in the material and virtual spaces where teaching and learning happen, among those who may be outside of formal relationships as "teachers" and "students." This theme echoes Chandra Mohanty's use of "pedagogies of dissent" to refer to the processes and project of constructing oppositional pedagogies - i.e., those that attend to gender and race as indices of power and material relations, as well as those of coloniality and capitalism, of sexuality and bodily diversity, and all of these in their inextricably intersectional entanglements. How are such pedagogies constructed? Through what means, in what spaces? What are the exigent conditions giving rise to their emergence? What conditions of possibility allow them to flourish, or diminish their effectiveness?

These questions bear particular urgency given the particular pressures facing teachers at all levels of the academy, broadly construed, in the current conjuncture. These include the enactment of legislation across the United States that legalizes the carrying of guns on college campuses, as well as the ways that "academic freedom" is so regularly an explicit battleground for students and faculty members who address inequality and injustice through the critical idioms and intellectual traditions of anti-imperialism and anti-colonialism, sexuality, and anti- racism. It also includes the foundational debt of the academy to indigenous dispossession and slavery, the historic and ongoing effects of that indebtedness, and the relationship of these foundations to the contemporary corporatization and intensifying privatization of the academy.

While pedagogy invokes the role education plays as a cornerstone of democracy - as a critical part of the public sphere - and as such, how it has long served as and continues to function as a flashpoint in debates regarding the meaningfulness of democracy for different groups of people, dissent is arguably at the heart of not just educational politics, but the political economic field in which education at all levels, and in formal and informal settings, unfolds today. Protests unfolding in colleges across and outside of the United States focus attention on the debilitating debt burden of higher education; on the long-lived and thoroughgoing structural inhospitability of colleges and universities to black people and black intellectual traditions; on sexual violence and gendered inequality and the ways that that inequality shapes the possibilities of thriving in and beyond the academy; and, on the policies that would exclude undocumented migrants from formal education. In Chile, China, Hong Kong, India, Israel, Mexico, Palestine, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, among many other places, in addition to the United States, conflict and contestation in and over education precipitated by intensifying poverty and political repression, colonialism and neoliberalism, continue to erupt, reminding us of the locally felt impact of the era of, as well as the long histories giving rise to, globalized racial capitalism. Ongoing resistance to the "common core" adjustments compulsorily organizing K-12 curricula and the demands of parents and teachers to reverse the course of the de-funding of public education across the United States unfold alongside the struggles over wages and contracts, not only of teachers but of the "blue collar" workers who literally keep the buildings and institutions of education viable sites of research and teaching. In Chicago , the site of this program, teachers and allies take to the streets to demand support for education, such actions mirrored in long histories of activism in and for schools and for education more broadly: think of the contestation over the education of enslaved and formerly enslaved persons throughout the nineteenth century and well into the twentieth; the dismantling of "Indian Schools" established to Christianize indigenous children; the social, intellectual, political, and legal struggles that precipitated Brown v. Board; the educational agenda of radical political groups like the Black Panther Party; the socio-politics subtending Freedom Schools, and so on.

This theme suggests that contemporary conditions are cause for critical pause in considerations of dissent - its precipitating grounds, its consequences, its aspirations. What can be asked and studied, said and taught, and by whom and how? And how are the responses to such questions embedded in long lived and ongoing contestations over the purposes and shapes of education? Strongly resonant with the histories of Chicago, we are interested in proliferating attention to the multiple and variegated sites through which pedagogies of dissent emerge and operate. The 2017 Program Committee invites proposals that address the broad range of issues, intellectual genealogies, and critical itineraries speaking to pedagogies of dissent. Proposals might engage such questions as: How is pedagogy implicated in colonialist and nationalist projects of dispossession, and what part does it play in decolonial activities? How do we learn and unlearn the epistemologies of heteronormativity, whiteness, and racial capitalism? What do the dissenting pedagogies of disability studies illuminate about the ways in which certain bodies are naturalized and others deemed extraordinary? What forms of pedagogy are associated with revolution and resistance, and what political economic and socio-cultural structures induce and necessitate them? What is the affective life of differing pedagogies? How are pedagogy and dissent both "about" intimacy, and what does intimacy come to mean in such contexts? In what ways do popular culture and social media induce and produce forms of learning and unlearning, and to what effects? How does the online saturation of social, political, and cultural life shift how we understand the possibilities of pedagogies of dissent? Why does pedagogy matter now, and how differently has it mattered and taken shape, for different groups, various sites, and in different historical conjunctures? What forms does dissent take now that are not pedagogical, and what might that tell us about both past and present conditions?

Proposals might also address such issues as:

  • histories, politics, and aesthetics of dissent, consent, and assent, and the relationships among them;
  • pedagogical technologies and the possibilities of dissent;
  • pedagogical models and philosophies;
  • topographies and spaces of rebellion;
  • fugitive networks, marronage;
  • the horizons and methods of dissent;
  • the praxis of consciousness raising;
  • cultures and aesthetics of dissent;
  • genealogies of revolutionary thought and praxis;
  • the pleasures of pedagogies of dissent;
  • indigenous knowledges and expertise;
  • the pleasures and dangers of pedagogy and of dissent;
  • the scales and geographies of opposition;
  • patronage or apprentice systems;
  • the material conditions of dissent;
  • the cultural and political economies of pedagogy and dissent;
  • appropriations of the "master's tools";
  • reactionary movements;
  • mediation and circulation;
  • the materiality of pedagogical praxis;
  • the labor and costs of dissent, and the labor and costs of teaching and of learning and unlearning;
  • the imaginaries and affective life of dissent;
  • the social life of dissent;
  • the pedagogies of hegemonic metrics and those of dissenting measures.

The deadline for proposals of panels and individual papers is February 1, 2017.

All proposal submitters must be current members of the ASA (or an affiliated international American studies association)

Submission FAQs (PDF)

  • All proposal submitters must be current members of the ASA (or an affiliated international American studies association).
  • Each panel submission should also include a second current ASA (or affiliated international American studies association) member in addition to the panel organizer.
  • All other panelists, including chairs and commentators, are expected to pay their membership dues to the ASA (or an affiliated international American studies association) by April 1, 2017, if their proposal is accepted.
  • Only current members of the ASA (or an affiliated international American studies association) will be listed in the annual meeting program.
  • All participants, including chairs and commentators, are expected to pay their conference registration fees early by June 1, 2017.
  • Only registered participants will be listed in the annual meeting program.

Membership includes subscriptions to American Quarterly and the ASA Newsletter (quarterly publication). Membership also includes discounts on conference registration and hotel. Membership is available for a calendar year only. Duration of membership is January 1 to December 31.

Dues are graduated according to income. The fee schedule below is for membership dues only. It does not include conference registration fees.

  • Student/ Emeritus/Income below $12,000--- $20.00
  • Income between $12,001 - $36,000--- $55.00
  • Income between $36,001 - $60,000--- $75.00
  • Income between $60,001 - $80,000--- $99.00
  • Income over $80,001--- $120.00
  • Lifetime Member--- $1500.00
  • Joint Member Secondary--- $15.00

Register here to begin or renew an ASA membership and to submit a proposal.

The submission site will open on January 1, 2017. Follow the submission instructions precisely and start the application process early. Emailed, faxed, scanned, or posted proposals will NOT be accepted. It is not possible to extend the submission deadline or accept late submissions for any reason. The submission site will automatically shut down at 11:59 PM (Pacific) on February 1, 2017.

Proposal Submissions

We encourage you to consult Getting on the ASA Meeting Program: A Practical Guide before you submit a proposal.

Please carefully read the proposal submission requirements and guidelines below before proceeding to use the online submission site. Follow the submission instructions precisely and start the application process early. The help menu on each page of the submission site should answer your site related questions.

The ASA staff is eager to help people navigate the submission site, but that work is possible only when the staff is not pushed up against the deadline. Contact us at least 72 hours before the submission deadline if you need technical assistance. The ASA staff will also respond to emailed questions until 2 PM (Pacific) on February 1, 2017 at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). It is not possible to extend the submission deadline or accept late submissions for any reason. The submission site will automatically shut down at 11:59 PM (Pacific) on February 1, 2017.

There are a number of ways that our membership could help both themselves and the program committee when using the on-line system. First, ASA guidelines clearly state that a member may appear only once on the program. When members do not heed this advice, they create more work for the program committee as well as jeopardize both of the panels for which they have committed themselves. Second, we encourage members who have agreed to participate in a panel or have submitted a paper not to then double register as commentator and chair. Third, ASA guidelines state that sessions should reflect institutional and disciplinary diversity. One of the benefits of attending a national conference is to interact with scholars from institutions and fields other than our own. So, when proposals arrived with presenters from only one institution or field they are less attractive to a program committee regardless of content. Fourth, you may submit only one proposal. Finally, it is important to remember that the competition for these slots is extremely competitive.

Proposal Types

Proposals on any topic dealing with American Studies may be submitted for traditional paper sessions. Proposals may be submitted for sessions with alterative formats including sessions with papers and sessions without papers (see below). Proposals may also be submitted for individual papers.

Proposals for sessions with papers, including traditional paper sessions, as well as those in talk, online, or exhibit formats, should indicate in a one-page description the session subject/s and the proposed format. Such proposals should also include all relevant information requested below in the submission guidelines and instructions and must include abstracts for each individual presenter.

Proposals for sessions without papers, such as workshops, dialogues, and performances, should indicate in a one-page description the session subject/s and the proposed format. Such proposals should also include all relevant information requested below, though they need not include individual presenter abstracts.

Proposed presentations should represent work in progress, rather than published work. Presentations should offer unique, original work not presented elsewhere.

Standing Committee, Caucus, Taskforce, and Program Committee members are authorized and encouraged to submit session proposals. Proposals from organizations affiliated with the ASA are also welcome.

All Standing Committee, Caucus, Taskforce, Affiliated Society, and Program Committee member proposals must adhere to the same conditions, deadlines and restrictions as other session proposals, and are subject to review by the Program Committee.

Alternative Proposal Formats for Chicago, Illinois, 2017

The Program Committee supports innovative formats that disrupt the conventional "three people reading papers" format.

The Program Committee believes that we cannot think about new, powerful connections between the academy and the world if we use only conventional academic forms. The Committee is proposing, therefore, several formats different from conventional paper-reading sessions. The Committee urges you to consider them if they seem appropriate and useful.

In order to broaden the modes of presentation and discussion in the Annual Meeting program, we invite proposals in two broad categories of non-traditional formats:

A. Sessions with Papers.

Although these resemble conventional sessions in having a chair, presentation of papers to an audience, and commentary, papers in these sessions will not be read aloud, allowing more time for informed, informal, and engaged discussion. These sessions require an abstract.

"Talk" format. Presenters will write papers, as usual, and distribute them to the chair, commentator, and other panelists by the deadline. But in the session they will "talk" their paper from notes, speaking directly to the audience rather than reading line-by-line.

On-line format. Presenters will post their papers on the Internet one month before the meeting. These sessions will be prominently marked in the program as intended primarily for an audience that has read the papers in advance and followed whatever on-line discussion they may have generated. The session will be devoted to formal commentary and group discussion. The panel will set up the web site on their own server, post the online papers, and provide the forum for discussion of them. The ASA will publicize the on line sessions and install the links from the on line program to the panel's web site and discussion blog.

Exhibit format. Presenters will post their materials on a large bulletin board that can accommodate text pages in large type, graphics, primary source extracts, etc. Video and audio clips can also be used. These sessions will feature three or four such presentations grouped around a common theme. The first half of the session gives the audience time to read and discuss each exhibit with the presenters. The second half encourages group discussion, facilitated by a chair and commentators.

B. Sessions without Papers.

In past meetings, the ASA has already sponsored many kinds of alternative sessions: roundtables, conversations, performances, multi-media presentations, readings of creative work, workshops involving audience participation, and presentations linked to the community outside the hotel (community centers, museums, secondary schools, prisons, etc.). These formats will experiment with creative forms of expression, performance and dialogue that represent a significant departure to conventional presentations of papers. These sessions require an abstract.

Performative format. Presenters will perform their work. This could include the range of artistic performing arts (dance, music, drama, spoken word, performance art) to multi-media presentations (video, film, audio, digital media) and readings of creative fiction and non-fiction.

Dialogue format (Roundtables).Presenters will engage in dialogues with each other and the audience. Possible formats could include roundtables of academics; forums with scholars, community activists, mass or alternative media-makers and public officials; conversations between performing and/or visual artists, curators, and educators about aesthetic and expressive innovations or the challenges of developing public cultures in diverse communities. This format might be particularly well suited to creating linkages with the communities outside the hotel (community centers, performing arts centers, museums, secondary schools, prisons, libraries, and other public sites).

Workshop format. Presenters will create venues to verbally and physically interact with the audience. Educators, artists, and curators, for example, could lead these workshops to emphasize the interactive challenges and possibilities of interdisciplinarity and American Studies.

We are excited about the possibilities for Chicago, 2017. We hope you will join us in making this a stimulating, conversational, and useful conference for the American Studies Association and its members.

ASA Individual Paper Submission Instructions


    Register here to begin or renew an ASA membership and to submit a proposal.

All individual paper submitters will need the following:

  • Individual Paper Title (maximum of 15 words per title. Do not begin the title with quotes or other characters.)
  • Paper Abstract (maximum of 500 words per abstract)
  • Session Keywords
  • Special Requests
  • Individual Author information including: first name, last name, affiliation, e-mail address, and a 350 word biographical statement. (Example of a biographical statement)
  • Confirmation of current membership status

IMPORTANT: type all information as it should appear in the program. Use appropriate grammar, punctuation, sentence construction, and do not use abbreviations. The information you type in this form will be included in the ASA program book (if your proposal is accepted). Type title as it should appear in the program (limit to fifteen words).

Do not type in all capital letters. Use initial caps only. Do not include quotations or other characters at the beginning of your title.

Those submitting individual paper proposals will receive a confirmation e-mail that the paper has been submitted. The Program Committee will organize as many individual papers as possible into sessions. Individual paper submitters will each have to create a brand new user account at the convention submission site, even if he or she submitted last year, and the submitter can edit his or her personal information, paper titles, and abstracts. Proposals may be edited after submission only until February 1, 2017, but personal information may be updated at any time.

ASA Session Submission Instructions:


    Register here to begin or renew an ASA membership and to submit a proposal.

The session submitter will need the following:

  • Session Title (maximum of 15 words)
  • Session Abstract (maximum of 500 words)
  • Session Keywords
  • Special Requests
  • Paper Title from each presenter (maximum of 15 words per title) for sessions with papers only
  • Paper Abstract from each presenter (maximum of 500 words per abstract) for sessions with papers only
  • Contact and biographical information from each session participant (presenters, chair, commentator) including: first name, last name, affiliation, e-mail address, and a 350 word biographical statement (Example of a biographical statement)
  • Indicate the current membership status of each session participant in the biographical statement. The session organizer will notify any non-member panelist immediately to join the ASA if their proposal is accepted

IMPORTANT: type all information as it should appear in the program. Use appropriate grammar, punctuation, sentence construction, and do not use abbreviations. The information you type in this form will be included in the ASA program book (if your proposal is accepted). Type title as it should appear in the program (limit to fifteen words).

Do not type in all capital letters. Use initial caps only. Do not include quotations or other characters at the beginning of your title.

Standing Committee, Caucus, Task Force, Program Committee, and Affiliated Society proposals should state the organizational sponsor's name at the beginning of the session title.


Session submitters: You will receive a confirmation e-mail upon submission. You will find copies of all emails in the message center of your All Academic user account. You will serve as the primary contact with panelists and the ASA. You are responsible for editing paper titles, abstracts, and biographical statements. The proposal may be accessed only through your account. You may edit the session proposal until February 1, 2017. You are also responsible for ensuring your panelists join the ASA (or are members of an affiliated international American studies association) and register for the annual meeting.

Panelists: You will find copies of all emails in the message center of your All Academic user account. You may not access the proposal through your All Academic user account. You may only update your account profile, affiliation, and contact information. You must join the ASA (or be a member of an affiliated international American studies association) and register for the annual meeting.

Submission Restrictions and Guidelines

1. So that as many members as possible will have the opportunity to be actively involved in the Annual Meeting, you may participate in only one scholarly session on the program.

2. Your name may appear on only one scholarly proposal no matter the role.

3. The Program Committee will eliminate you from consideration if your name appears on more than one scholarly proposal.

4. If your name is otherwise listed on two or more scholarly proposals in whatever role you will render those proposals ineligible for consideration by the Program Committee.

5. The Council has charged its caucuses and standing committees with organizing professional development panels. You may serve on one professional development panel and on one scholarly panel.

6. Sessions submitted without a chair will not be considered.

7. You may chair and comment on the same session.

8. You may chair and present on the same session without papers.

9. You may not chair or comment and present a paper on the same session with papers.

10. If a panel has a commentator, he or she should not be the dissertation adviser of any member of the panel.

11. Session organizers should seek out a mix of junior and senior panelists, as well as a mix of institutions represented by faculty and graduate student panelists.

A major headache at all Annual Meetings is papers that go on for too long, wearying the audience and disrupting the schedule. Session organizers should make sure that their session begins on time, and that participants do not abuse the time limits. All sessions are 105 minutes in length. This includes the reading of papers, responses by the commentators and comments from the audience. When an audience has sat through a typical session of three papers and one response by a commentator, they quite rightly feel cheated and frustrated if no time is left for audience participation.

The following chart can be used by the session chair as a guide to allocating time during the session, assuming that one takes five minutes for introductions.

Session Length Number of Papers or Presentations Time Allowed per Paper or Presentation Time Allowed for a Single Commentator Time Allowed for Audience Comments
105 minutes 3 20 (2000 words) 20 20
105 minutes 4 16 (1600 words) 16 20
105 minutes 5 13 (1300 words) 15 20

Participation Requirements

The association expects that people agreeing to appear on the ASA program should recognize their professional responsibility to support the organization with their dues as well as conference registration fees. The session organizer should inform the members of the proposed panel of these requirements before submitting a proposal. The session organizer is also responsible for ensuring that their panelists promptly comply with these requirements.

The Program Committee advises each participant of his or her professional and ethical obligation to appear, and also to locate suitable replacements in the event of an unavoidable withdrawal.

Participants are responsible for obtaining the funding they need to attend the Annual Meeting. Participants must arrange their own travel and accommodation.

Membership and registration fees are neither refundable nor transferable.Forfeited registration fees will automatically transfer to the Baxter Travel Grant Fund. The Baxter Grants provide partial travel reimbursement to advanced graduate students who are members of the ASA and will travel to the convention in order to appear on the Annual Meeting program.

Audio-Visual Equipment

The ASA will supply all session rooms with a Digital Equipment Package. Included: LCD/multimedia data projector, with speakers, laptop (MS Powerpoint, CD, & DVD capable, PC but MAC compatible), screen, wireless internet, and on site technical support.

If you want additional digital equipment, you will have to rent it at your own expense. If you want to use analog equipment such as an Overhead Projector, Slide Projectors, or TV/VCR/DVD's, you will have to bring your own equipment or rent it at your own expense.

We do NOT offer Skype to accommodate individual panelists who do not attend the meeting in person. Skype is a very unsatisfactory medium for video-conferencing with a group. The picture quality when blown up to a necessary size for a group is very poor, and the speaker at the remote location will not be able to identify questioners.

Program Decisions

The Program Committee will organize sessions from individual paper proposals and, on occasion, will combine individual papers with proposed full sessions. If your paper or panel is not accepted, the Committee may call upon you to play an alternative role at the meeting as a chair or commentator. To facilitate the Committee's work, please indicate on the online submission form whether you are willing to act as chair or commentator on another session. The Committee also invites self-nominations from ASA members to serve as chairs and commentators exclusively on sessions constructed from individual submissions.

After the February 1, 2017, deadline for submission of proposals, the Program Committee will meet to review the proposals and select the sessions to be held at the upcoming Annual Meeting. The Committee will approve proposals on the basis of their quality in relation to the others submitted. The Committee will also: attempt to include sessions on a wide variety of subjects and approaches, including scholarly, pedagogical, and professional subjects; consciously support the inclusion of panels focused on topics of concern to different minority groups; strive to balance its selections between topics of continuing interest and new topics to which little or no attention has been paid; look for sessions in which scholars in different fields engage one another on a common topic; and try to span different time periods and subject matters in sessions constructed from individual papers. There will be room for specialized sessions on particular subjects.

To avoid favoritism, the Committee will take care not to overload the sessions with faculty and graduate students from institutions represented by members of the Committee. This does not disallow members of the Committee from presenting papers. The Committee will make every effort to assure diverse representation through the inclusion of minorities, women, graduate students, and international colleagues, and will seek to reflect the regional and disciplinary diversity of the Association's membership.

Notification and Participation

Once the Committee has finalized the program, all persons who have submitted proposals will be notified by email of the Committee's decisions by March 31st. All emails are also delivered to the message center of your All Academic user account. Session organizers are responsible for notifying the members of the proposed panel of the Program Committee's decision. If you do not receive an official e-mail by April 15th, it may be because you did not complete the submission process properly, your email address is incorrect, or your email has very sensitive spam blockers that are blocking the incoming email. Please e-mail the conference director at: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

The session chair will coordinate contact among the session participants to ensure maximum integration of presentations. Participants should send the session chair a brief biographical statement to be used in introductions.

Almost all sessions and events will take place at the Hyatt Regency Chicago. Sessions may be scheduled from 8 am on Thursday, November 9, 2017, until 5 pm on Sunday, November 12, 2017. Participants should be available for scheduling at any time during the entire meeting. It is not possible to guarantee any session or panelist a day or time on the program. Submitters may not request a session slot on the program.

  • If notified by May 1, 2017, the Program Committee will try to honor requests to provide reasonable scheduling accommodations for "disabled" program participants under the public accommodations provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
  • If notified by May 1, 2017, the ASA will provide ASL Interpretation for panels with hearing-impaired presenters.
  • If notified by May 1, 2017, the Program Committee will try to honor requests not to schedule a presentation on a religious holiday.

Scheduling will not be completed until June 15, 2017. We suggest that you do not purchase airline tickets or male travel plans before the schedule is finalized.

If a session has a commentator, that session's participants must send copies of their completed papers to him or her by October 15, 2017.

On Line Program

Sessions may post links to graphics, primary source extracts, video and audio clips, illustrations, posters, or other materials in the on line program. If notified by October 15, 2017. with the URL's and link descriptions, the ASA will install the links from the on line program to those on line materials, the panel's web site, and its discussion blog, if any. It is not possible for presenters to "upload" those materials directly to the on line program.


The ASA reminds participants of their professional and ethical obligation to appear in person at their session at the annual meeting. No-shows are conspicuous in their absence. They inconvenience the chair and fellow presenters, as well as those attending their session. The American Studies Association defines a no-show as someone on the program who is not physically present at her/his session at the annual meeting and who (1) has not notified ASA in advance that s/he cannot attend the meeting by October 15, 2017, and/or (2) has not submitted a presentation to be read by the chair or another person at the meeting by October 15, 2017. No-shows will not be considered for the following year's program. If you notify ASA in advance and submit a presentation to be made by someone else at their session, you will not be penalized. You are responsible for finding your own alternative presenter.

Contact Us

For further information about the Call for Proposals, you may contact the president, Kandice Chuh (kchuhASA@gmail.com), the program chairs Laura Kang (laura.kang@uci.edu), Siobhan Somerville (sbs@illinois.edu), and Alexandra Vazquez (atv202@nyu.edu), or the ASA's conference director .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)